Nowadays, many frameworks are good enough to fulfill whatever needs you want to have in web development. It totally relies on which environment you feel more suitable. So whatever you prefer to use it is really matter of that you enjoy most when using.
Bootstrap and Foundation are the world’s most popular front-end frameworks which are used by the “bootstrap designer” for creating a new web design project with full-responsive and modern site pattern.
These frameworks are especially designed for website prototyping and both arrive with ready-to-use components, which speed your workflow process of coding in a seamless way. Moreover, it offers bonuses like ready-to-go CSS components and cross-browser compatibility.
Anyhow, it matters what’s best: Bootstrap VS Foundation. Most of elementary features are looked similar. Only minor differences are there in both frameworks. Let’s kick it off on a positive note with some areas where Bootstrap & Foundation has upper hand.
It’s built for developers and designers:
A unique thing about Bootstrap, which enables you to download it, customizes it and petrifies it at a website, thus providing a silver-bullet technology for developers. Simultaneously, there are a few drawbacks for a web designer is that you feel more difficult to make some changes.
Foundation is much better in this perspective and it becomes more flexible framework than Bootstrap by utilizing the mix-ins. It offers you all tools that you need and use it straight out of the box to customize things. Foundation approaches encourage best practices with mobile-first and separation of presentation from content.
Features and components usage for mobile devices:
Foundation comes with a turnkey solution for creating responsive content for the media too. You can use Interchange to identify different images for different media quires instead of downloading the same size image on all devices. Further, the interchange provides you silver-bulletin solution for responsive images in case of your needs and also offers you handy features like pricing, tables and off-canvas navigation.
There is no argument in Bootstrap with responsive design and its perfectly matched to prototyping and building sites with a theme rapidly. Moreover, it makes easy for you to add responsiveness to elements such as object, embed and iframe by using responsive embeds. Yet it doesn’t really optimize content for all mobile devices.
Bootstrap offers you everything you need to get a site up quickly, while Foundation tends to provides good environment for customization. Although it’s possible to customize with Bootstrap, which takes less effort to get your site to not look like other Bootstrap sites. An out-of-the-box CSS design looks good right away with the Foundation. But there is no need to customize too heavily.
Bootstrap assists even non-designers to make out something professional. The foundation will be the best platform for browser defaults in numerous cases with less customization work. A unique thing that impressed me about Bootstrap, it allows you to update to future versions of Bootstrap without breaking your custom stylesi.
Bootstrap totally depends on pixels whereas Foundation relies on rems, during the process of calculating widths, typography and everything else. A unique thing between the two frameworks is operational differences and has ability to generate equal results.
Pixels are much familiar to both web designers and graphic artists. Yet I recommend you to go for rem unit, which helps you in think in need of proportions. It depends totally based on your requirement workflow. Bootstrap may be the best choice for you if your work depends on pixel basis.
It is one of most prominent key features for both front-end frameworks. Designers and developers can make use of this core feature to make changes with confidence and prototype layouts. The foundation is being as ahead of the competitor in this domain and the first framework, which enter into responsive in a short period.
Anyhow Bootstrap plays a crucial role in this field now. Only the difference lacks on creating syntax grids, so it totally depends on personal activities of developers but as the final result will be same in both frameworks.
As a discussion, Bootstrap and Foundation ensures better performance and good browser compatibility in web development field and an ideal match for developers. Whatever it may be difference lacks on dependent on the context. Developer can prefer Foundation, if they feel on mobile experience. Otherwise go for Bootstrap if you need website without much customization.