Twitter Bootstrap3: where it excels&fails?

twitter-bootstrap3 banner

Without question, Bootstrap is one of the frameworks which help developers to create websites so effortlessly. This framework is used in development of many websites over the internet, and a good list of developers loves to work with Twitter’s Bootstrap 3. Recently, a good number of website developers started expressing their hatred for bootstrap templates as well as web designing patterns. This article throws light into the fact that why many developers prefer the using of Bootstrap over other frameworks? And why some others go against it?

Why Twitter Bootstrap 3 is highly popular?

Good documentation:- a Bootstrap designer enjoys superb documentation, and any doubts regarding the documentation can be cleared easily with the help of Github repository.

Rapid development:- in built templates that help fast website development is another aspect which tops among the list of core Bootstrap 3 features. Developers can complete their projects without taking much effort.

Pre-configured variables:- the time to develop websites as well as applications is largely saved by the pre-configured variables. Colours of buttons, headings, and many repeated elements used in a website can be automatically adjusted with the help of these variables.

Superior Grid system:- grid system of Bootstrap3 is largely developed when compared to the Bootstrap first version. Grid system is more responsive now. It has become nest-enabled. Thus it began to suit the needs of developers who create websites for all devices.

Improved JavaScript functionality, elements& box-sizes:- the consistency and work flow that web designers gain while Bootstrap is fantastic. All these elements assist developers to finish tasks in a systematic way.

Where Bootstrap 3 fails to impress?

Use of similar components:- a Bootstrap designer gets plenty of options to edit the templates and use it in various ways. Still he deals with similar component. There are more than thousands of websites made using this framework available on the web. Hence you will find a lot of similarities in the designing pattern of these websites.

Updating the core code is bit hard;- any developer can download components and edit it as they wish. For that purpose, developers will have to include the codes written by them in separate places. Updating of core codes are not an easy task when we use this framework. Let us take the instance of grid components. When you download a grid component, it will come in a large file size having massive codes written to it. No developers need the entire codes for the purpose of web development. Then they will have to retain codes that are needed and delete the unwanted ones. After deleting the unwanted ones, developers will have to update the core codes, and here most developers face difficulties.

Needs only less creativity;- designers who lack creativity can also try Bootstrap. What they will have to do is that import the CSS file and use the templates that are repeatedly used. Thus web designs look almost similar when we use Bootstrap templates that make use of similar templates.


Bootstrap is a framework while is ideal for the purpose of web development, not for designing. Designers will have to set the fonts, colours, grids, pixel sizes, and check the responsive quality for perfecting the websites. This the realm in which Bootstrap fails to impress, when we consider the web development aspects, it is a step ahead of other frameworks.


Bootstrap Vs Foundation: which is better to use?

bootstrap vs foundation banner

Nowadays, many frameworks are good enough to fulfill whatever needs you want to have in web development. It totally relies on which environment you feel more suitable. So whatever you prefer to use it is really matter of that you enjoy most when using.

Bootstrap and Foundation are the world’s most popular front-end frameworks which are used by the “bootstrap designer” for creating a new web design project with full-responsive and modern site pattern.

These frameworks are especially designed for website prototyping and both arrive with ready-to-use components, which speed your workflow process of coding in a seamless way. Moreover, it offers bonuses like ready-to-go CSS components and cross-browser compatibility.

Anyhow, it matters what’s best: Bootstrap VS Foundation. Most of elementary features are looked similar. Only minor differences are there in both frameworks. Let’s kick it off on a positive note with some areas where Bootstrap & Foundation has upper hand.

It’s built for developers and designers:

A unique thing about Bootstrap, which enables you to download it, customizes it and petrifies it at a website, thus providing a silver-bullet technology for developers. Simultaneously, there are a few drawbacks for a web designer is that you feel more difficult to make some changes.

Foundation is much better in this perspective and it becomes more flexible framework than Bootstrap by utilizing the mix-ins. It offers you all tools that you need and use it straight out of the box to customize things. Foundation approaches encourage best practices with mobile-first and separation of presentation from content.

Features and components usage for mobile devices:

Foundation comes with a turnkey solution for creating responsive content for the media too. You can use Interchange to identify different images for different media quires instead of downloading the same size image on all devices. Further, the interchange provides you silver-bulletin solution for responsive images in case of your needs and also offers you handy features like pricing, tables and off-canvas navigation.

There is no argument in Bootstrap with responsive design and its perfectly matched to prototyping and building sites with a theme rapidly. Moreover, it makes easy for you to add responsiveness to elements such as object, embed and iframe by using responsive embeds. Yet it doesn’t really optimize content for all mobile devices.


Bootstrap offers you everything you need to get a site up quickly, while Foundation tends to provides good   environment for customization. Although it’s possible to customize with Bootstrap, which takes less effort to get your site to not look like other Bootstrap sites. An out-of-the-box CSS design looks good right away with the Foundation. But there is no need to customize too heavily.

Bootstrap assists even non-designers to make out something professional. The foundation will be the best platform for browser defaults in numerous cases with less customization work. A unique thing that impressed me about Bootstrap, it allows you to update to future versions of Bootstrap without breaking your custom stylesi.

Sizing units:

Bootstrap totally depends on pixels whereas Foundation relies on rems, during the process of calculating widths, typography and everything else. A unique thing between the two frameworks is operational differences and has ability to generate equal results.

Pixels are much familiar to both web designers and graphic artists. Yet I recommend you to go for rem unit, which helps you in think in need of proportions. It depends totally based on your requirement workflow. Bootstrap may be the best choice for you if your work depends on pixel basis.

Grid system:

It is one of most prominent key features for both front-end frameworks. Designers and developers can make use of this core feature to make changes with confidence and prototype layouts. The foundation is being as ahead of the competitor in this domain and the first framework, which enter into responsive in a short period.

Anyhow Bootstrap plays a crucial role in this field now. Only the difference lacks on creating syntax grids, so it totally depends on personal activities of developers but as the final result will be same in both frameworks.

Final Thoughts:

As a discussion, Bootstrap and Foundation ensures better performance and good browser compatibility in web development field and an ideal match for developers. Whatever it may be difference lacks on dependent on the context. Developer can prefer Foundation, if they feel on mobile experience. Otherwise go for Bootstrap if you need website without much customization.

Create a Responsive Website Design using Twitter Bootstrap

responsive twitter bootstrap banner

Responsive Website Design’. Let the stress lie on the term ‘Responsive’. Responsive or Responsiveness of a website means how compatible it is to devices of different kinds and sizes. When a website lacks compatibility when used on different devices like laptops, desktops, smartphones, it will become a nightmare for the user. The readability of the website will be poor. That said, improved responsiveness can be done using Twitter Bootstrap. Seeking of Bootstrap development services for any web application will make it successful.

Twitter Bootstrap, containing HTML and CSS-based design templates, has, of late, been in the reckoning with its version 3.0. A free and open-source development framework like Bootstrap is aimed at easing the development of web applications and dynamic websites.

Let us see how Twitter bootstrap, particularly version 3, ensures responsive web layouts by building sites that only require a minimal resizing, panning, scrolling when used on a range of devices.

Creating a Responsive Website Design using the latest Twitter Bootstrap

Bootstrap very well integrates attractive typography into sites and web applications by incorporating numerous HTML style attributes. Few of the UI challenges of a developer like fonts, tables, icons, buttons, etc are addressed with the help of this skilful framework.

Version 3.0 of Twitter bootstrap comes with added advantages. It comes with a Mobile First approach. Apart from being tested on the classic web browsers, CSS framework is also tested on iOS and Android.

Using fluid and proportion-based grids, CSS3 media queries and flexible images, a site adapts to the layout of the device on which it is put to use. Instead of pixels or points, the concept of fluid grids requires page element sizing that has to be in relative units, i.e., in percentages. Also, to stop the images from being displayed outside the containing element, they too are sized in the relative units.

The necessity to include additional style sheet for enabling a responsive feature does not arise. The creation of mobile-friendly and highly responsive websites is now very much simpler, thanks to the 3rd version’s mobile-first grid system.

The predefined grid classes in bootstrap 3 help in making grid layouts for various devices like tablets, mobiles, laptops and desktops. The four tiers grid classes(xs, sm, md, lg) offers good control over the layout.


After the coming of tablets, smartphones, with various sizes, the need for optimization of sites for various devices that are of various sizes has only grown bigger. With the use of Twitter Bootstrap, not only the accessibility but also a user’s optimal viewing experience will be achieved.

Bootstrap 4 coming with excellent features

bootstrap4 features

The famous Bootstrap framework needs no introduction. Nevertheless, in a nutshell, it is a free and open-source web design framework with a set of tools meant for creating web applications and websites. Four years have passed after it was introduced, and it still continues to enjoy the popular support of all the companies employing Bootstrap designers.

With version 2 came the responsive design components, and with version 3, Bootstrap has moved to a mobile first approach. On its fourth anniversary, its founders have come out with the Alpha release of Bootstrap 4. So what can be its anticipated? What are its features, up gradations? Let us analyze…

Enhanced Grid system

Right from Bootstrap 3, the grid system has been really wonderful, enabling to design responsive sites effectively and with less effort. Container, row, and column would be the 3 main components of Bootstrap 4 grid system. While the container be utilized for fixed width, container-fluid could be used for full-width rows. Each of the five grid tiers – extra small, small, medium, large, extra large – are to be used based on the minimum width.

More Sass ( Syntactically Awesome Stylesheets)

While, in all its previous versions, Bootstrap has used Less as its preprocessor as a way to compile variables, for the version 4, it uses Sass. Sass is considered to be more powerful and even has a wide developer community. Customization options will henceforth be handled as Sass variables. These options include round-corner angles, transitions, gradients, etc. Using the Bootstrap’s Customizer, it is easy to automate the build process.

An opt-in Flex box support

A new layout mode for CSS – Flexible Boxes is designed for accommodating elements for numerous screen sizes, resolutions, and layouts. Unlike the previous versions of Bootstrap, the version 4.0 offers Flex box as an opt-in ingredient. That said, it needs a CSS recompilation. Flex box support is accessible to the entire grid system and input groups.

Reebot.css: the new reset component

Normalize.css was previously used by Bootstrap as CSS reset. With Bootstrap 4, reset and base styles are clubbed into a single file. Hence, it would be effective to use just reebot.css

Glyphicons gone

Bootstrap 4 version has Glyphicon support withdrawn. In Bootstrap 3, Glyphicons icon font has been handy in adding iconography. There is nothing, however, to replace the withdrawn Glyphicon. Nevertheless, you can replace with MIT-licenced Ionicons through manual integration with Bootstrap.


Eagerly wait for the new changes that you will witness in the fourth version of bootstrap. Apart from the above mentioned few, you can also see the withdrawal of wells, thumbnails, IE8 support, etc.